# Description
Continuing from #12568, this PR further reduces the size of `Expr` from
64 to 40 bytes. It also reduces `Expression` from 128 to 96 bytes and
`Type` from 32 to 24 bytes.
This was accomplished by:
- for `Expr` with multiple fields (e.g., `Expr::Thing(A, B, C)`),
merging the fields into new AST struct types and then boxing this struct
(e.g. `Expr::Thing(Box<ABC>)`).
- replacing `Vec<T>` with `Box<[T]>` in multiple places. `Expr`s and
`Expression`s should rarely be mutated, if at all, so this optimization
makes sense.
By reducing the size of these types, I didn't notice a large performance
improvement (at least compared to #12568). But this PR does reduce the
memory usage of nushell. My config is somewhat light so I only noticed a
difference of 1.4MiB (38.9MiB vs 37.5MiB).
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
When implementing a `Command`, one must also import all the types
present in the function signatures for `Command`. This makes it so that
we often import the same set of types in each command implementation
file. E.g., something like this:
```rust
use nu_protocol::ast::Call;
use nu_protocol::engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack};
use nu_protocol::{
record, Category, Example, IntoInterruptiblePipelineData, IntoPipelineData, PipelineData,
ShellError, Signature, Span, Type, Value,
};
```
This PR adds the `nu_engine::command_prelude` module which contains the
necessary and commonly used types to implement a `Command`:
```rust
// command_prelude.rs
pub use crate::CallExt;
pub use nu_protocol::{
ast::{Call, CellPath},
engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack},
record, Category, Example, IntoInterruptiblePipelineData, IntoPipelineData, IntoSpanned,
PipelineData, Record, ShellError, Signature, Span, Spanned, SyntaxShape, Type, Value,
};
```
This should reduce the boilerplate needed to implement a command and
also gives us a place to track the breadth of the `Command` API. I tried
to be conservative with what went into the prelude modules, since it
might be hard/annoying to remove items from the prelude in the future.
Let me know if something should be included or excluded.
# Description
With the current typechecking logic this property has no effect.
It was only used in the example testing, and provided some indication of
this vectorizing property.
With #9742 all commands that previously declared it have explicit list
signatures. If we want to get it back in the future we can reconstruct
it from the signature.
Simplifies the example testing a bit.
# User-Facing Changes
Causes a breaking change for plugins that previously declared it. While
this causes a compile fail, this was already broken by our more
stringent type checking.
This will be a good reminder for plugin authors to update their
signature as well to reflect the more stringent type checking.
# Description
The same procedure as for #9778 repeated for records.
# User-Facing Changes
Commands that directly supported applying their work directly to record
fields via cell paths, that worked before #9680 will now work again
# Tests + Formatting
Tried to limit the need to add new `.allow_variants_without_examples()`
by adjusting or adding tests to also use some records with access.
# Description
Reallow the commands that take cellpaths as rest parameters to operate
on table input data.
Went through all commands returned by
```
scope commands |
filter { |cmd| $cmd.signatures |
values |
any {|sig| $sig |
any {|$sig| $sig.parameter_type == rest and $sig.syntax_shape ==
cellpath }
}
} | get name
```
Only exception to that was `is-empty` that returns a bool.
# User-Facing Changes
Same table operations as in `0.82` should still be possible
Mitigates effects of #9680
# Description
All commands that declared `.vectorizes_over_list(true)` now also
explicitly declare the list form of their scalar types.
- Explicit in/out list signatures for nu-command
- Explicit in/out list signatures for nu-cmd-extra
- Add comments about cellpath behavior that is still unresolved
# User-Facing Changes
Our type signatures will now be more explicit about which commands
support vectorization over lists.
On the downside this is a bit more verbose and less systematic.
requires
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9455
# ⚙️ Description
in this PR i move the commands we've all agreed, in the core team, to
move out of the core Nushell to the `extra` feature.
> **Warning**
> in the first commits here, i've
> - moved the implementations to `nu-cmd-extra`
> - removed the declaration of all the commands below from `nu-command`
> - made sure the commands were not available anymore with `cargo run --
-n`
## the list of commands to move
with the current command table downloaded as `commands.csv`, i've run
```bash
let commands = (
open commands.csv
| where is_plugin == "FALSE" and category != "deprecated"
| select name category "approv. %"
| rename name category approval
| insert treated {|it| (
($it.approval == 100) or # all the core team agreed on them
($it.name | str starts-with "bits") or # see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9241
($it.name | str starts-with "dfr") # see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9327
)}
)
```
to preprocess them and then
```bash
$commands | where {|it| (not $it.treated) and ($it.approval == 0)}
```
to get all untreated commands with no approval, which gives
```
╭────┬───────────────┬─────────┬─────────────┬──────────╮
│ # │ name │ treated │ category │ approval │
├────┼───────────────┼─────────┼─────────────┼──────────┤
│ 0 │ fmt │ false │ conversions │ 0 │
│ 1 │ each while │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 2 │ roll │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 3 │ roll down │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 4 │ roll left │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 5 │ roll right │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 6 │ roll up │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 7 │ rotate │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 8 │ update cells │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 9 │ decode hex │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 10 │ encode hex │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 11 │ from url │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 12 │ to html │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 13 │ ansi gradient │ false │ platform │ 0 │
│ 14 │ ansi link │ false │ platform │ 0 │
│ 15 │ format │ false │ strings │ 0 │
╰────┴───────────────┴─────────┴─────────────┴──────────╯
```
# 🖌️ User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```
# 🧪 Tests + Formatting
- ⚫ `toolkit fmt`
- ⚫ `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# 📖 After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# 🔍 For reviewers
```bash
$commands | where {|it| (not $it.treated) and ($it.approval == 0)} | each {|command|
try {
help $command.name | ignore
} catch {|e|
$"($command.name): ($e.msg)"
}
}
```
should give no output in `cargo run --features extra -- -n` and a table
with 16 lines in `cargo run -- -n`
