4b301710d3
# Description
Use `record!` macro instead of defining two separate `vec!` for `cols`
and `vals` when appropriate.
This visually aligns the key with the value.
Further more you don't have to deal with the construction of `Record {
cols, vals }` so we can hide the implementation details in the future.
## State
Not covering all possible commands yet, also some tests/examples are
better expressed by creating cols and vals separately.
# User/Developer-Facing Changes
The examples and tests should read more natural. No relevant functional
change
# Bycatch
Where I noticed it I replaced usage of `Value` constructors with
`Span::test_data()` or `Span::unknown()` to the `Value::test_...`
constructors. This should make things more readable and also simplify
changes to the `Span` system in the future.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| custom_value.rs | ||
| from_value.rs | ||
| from.rs | ||
| lazy_record.rs | ||
| mod.rs | ||
| range.rs | ||
| record.rs | ||
| stream.rs | ||
| unit.rs | ||