nushell/crates/nu-command/src/dataframe/expressions/is_in.rs
Darren Schroeder 5e70d4121a
Add dfr to dataframe cmds (#7998)
# Description

This PR tries to resolve the overloading issue by going back to our
original naming convention for dataframes. So, this PR renames all
dataframe commands with a prefix of `dfr`. Some commands like `open-df`
were renamed to `dfr open` and things like `into df` were renamed `dfr
into-df`. I'm sure we can optimize naming a bit, but it seems to compile
now.

# User-Facing Changes

All dataframe commands are prefixed with dfr.

# Tests + Formatting

Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass

# After Submitting

If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
2023-02-08 15:52:57 -06:00

115 lines
3.6 KiB
Rust

use crate::dataframe::values::{Column, NuDataFrame, NuExpression};
use nu_engine::CallExt;
use nu_protocol::{
ast::Call,
engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack},
Category, Example, PipelineData, ShellError, Signature, Span, SyntaxShape, Type, Value,
};
use polars::prelude::{lit, DataType};
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct ExprIsIn;
impl Command for ExprIsIn {
fn name(&self) -> &str {
"dfr is-in"
}
fn usage(&self) -> &str {
"Creates an is-in expression"
}
fn signature(&self) -> Signature {
Signature::build(self.name())
.required(
"list",
SyntaxShape::List(Box::new(SyntaxShape::Any)),
"List to check if values are in",
)
.input_type(Type::Custom("expression".into()))
.output_type(Type::Custom("expression".into()))
.category(Category::Custom("expression".into()))
}
fn examples(&self) -> Vec<Example> {
vec![Example {
description: "Creates a is-in expression",
example: r#"let df = ([[a b]; [one 1] [two 2] [three 3]] | dfr into-df);
$df | dfr with-column (dfr col a | dfr is-in [one two] | dfr as a_in)"#,
result: Some(
NuDataFrame::try_from_columns(vec![
Column::new(
"a".to_string(),
vec![
Value::test_string("one"),
Value::test_string("two"),
Value::test_string("three"),
],
),
Column::new(
"b".to_string(),
vec![Value::test_int(1), Value::test_int(2), Value::test_int(3)],
),
Column::new(
"a_in".to_string(),
vec![
Value::test_bool(true),
Value::test_bool(true),
Value::test_bool(false),
],
),
])
.expect("simple df for test should not fail")
.into_value(Span::test_data()),
),
}]
}
fn search_terms(&self) -> Vec<&str> {
vec!["check", "contained", "is-contain", "match"]
}
fn run(
&self,
engine_state: &EngineState,
stack: &mut Stack,
call: &Call,
input: PipelineData,
) -> Result<PipelineData, ShellError> {
let list: Vec<Value> = call.req(engine_state, stack, 0)?;
let expr = NuExpression::try_from_pipeline(input, call.head)?;
let values = NuDataFrame::try_from_columns(vec![Column::new("list".to_string(), list)])?;
let list = values.as_series(call.head)?;
if matches!(list.dtype(), DataType::Object(..)) {
return Err(ShellError::IncompatibleParametersSingle(
"Cannot use a mixed list as argument".into(),
call.head,
));
}
let expr: NuExpression = expr.into_polars().is_in(lit(list)).into();
Ok(PipelineData::Value(expr.into_value(call.head), None))
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod test {
use super::super::super::test_dataframe::test_dataframe;
use super::*;
use crate::dataframe::eager::WithColumn;
use crate::dataframe::expressions::alias::ExprAlias;
use crate::dataframe::expressions::col::ExprCol;
#[test]
fn test_examples() {
test_dataframe(vec![
Box::new(ExprIsIn {}),
Box::new(ExprAlias {}),
Box::new(ExprCol {}),
Box::new(WithColumn {}),
])
}
}