# Description
Fixes#13093 by:
* Removing the mentioned help example
* Updating the `--accessed` and `--modified` flag descriptions to remove
mention of "timestamp/date"
# User-Facing Changes
Help changes
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# Description
Related to #12832, this PR changes the way `help commands` displays the
command type to be consistent with `scope commands` and `which`.
# User-Facing Changes
Technically a breaking change since the `help commands` output can now
be different.
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/12874
- fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/12874
I want to fix the issue which is induced by the fix for
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/12369. after this pr. This pr
induced a new error for unix system, in order to show coredump messages
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
- this PR should close https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/12874
- fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/12874
I want to fix the issue which is induced by the fix for
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/12369. after this pr. This pr
induced a new error for unix system, in order to show coredump messages
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
after fix for 12874, coredump message is messing, so I want to fix it
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Makes `to toml` use the `toml::value::Datetime` type, so that `to toml`
serializes dates properly.
# User-Facing Changes
`to toml` will now encode dates differently, in a native format instead
of a string. This could, in theory, break some workflows:
```Nushell
# Before:
~> {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime
Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000 (10 hours ago)
# After:
~> {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime
Error: nu:🐚:only_supports_this_input_type
× Input type not supported.
╭─[entry #13:1:36]
1 │ {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime
· ────┬──── ──────┬──────
· │ ╰── only string and int input data is supported
· ╰── input type: date
╰────
```
Fix#11751
# Description
This pr is going to use `pathdiff::diff_path`, so we don't need to
handle for relative path by ourselves.
This is also the behavior before the rewritten of run_external.rs
It's a follow up to https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/13028
# User-Facing Changes
NaN
# Tests + Formatting
No need to add tests
Bumps [os_pipe](https://github.com/oconnor663/os_pipe.rs) from 1.1.5 to
1.2.0.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="6268f86399"><code>6268f86</code></a>
bump version to 1.2.0</li>
<li><a
href="b392c7e3c9"><code>b392c7e</code></a>
remove unsafe code from dup()</li>
<li><a
href="c7b2277bdb"><code>c7b2277</code></a>
move <code>mod sys</code> to the top of lib.rs</li>
<li><a
href="282b1884f6"><code>282b188</code></a>
update ci.yml</li>
<li><a
href="432da0803a"><code>432da08</code></a>
add rust-version to Cargo.toml</li>
<li><a
href="12868e41e6"><code>12868e4</code></a>
edition 2018 -> 2021</li>
<li><a
href="d9e8d61593"><code>d9e8d61</code></a>
activate IO safety integration by default</li>
<li><a
href="d02b96eddb"><code>d02b96e</code></a>
added visionos</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/oconnor663/os_pipe.rs/compare/1.1.5...1.2.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- this PR should close#11433
# Description
This PR implements pipeline input support for the stor insert and stor
update commands,
enabling users to directly pass data to these commands without relying
solely on flag parameters.
Previously, it was only possible to specify the record data using flag
parameters,
which could be less intuitive and become cumbersome:
```bash
stor insert --table-name nudb --data-record {bool1: true, int1: 5, float1: 1.1, str1: fdncred, datetime1: 2023-04-17}
stor update --table-name nudb --update-record {str1: nushell datetime1: 2020-04-17}
```
Now it is also possible to pass a record through pipeline input:
```bash
{bool1: true, int1: 5, float1: 1.1, str1: fdncred, datetime1: 2023-04-17} | stor insert --table-name nudb
{str1: nushell datetime1: 2020-04-17} | stor update --table-name nudb"
```
Changes made on code:
- Modified stor insert and stor update to accept a record from the
pipeline.
- Added logic to handle data from the pipeline record.
- Implemented an error case to prevent simultaneous data input from both
pipeline and flag.
# User-facing changes
Returns an error when both ways of inserting data are used.
The examples for both commands were updated and in each command, when
the -d or -u fags are being used at the same time as input is being
passed through the pipeline, it returns an error:
Also returns an error when both of them are missing:
# Tests + Formating
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Friães <rodrigo.friaes@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Configuration in `explore` has always been confusing to me. This PR
overhauls (and simplifies, I think) how configuration is done.
# Details
1. Configuration is now strongly typed. In `Explore::run()` we create an
`ExploreConfig` struct from the more general Nu configuration and
arguments to `explore`, then pass that struct to other parts of
`explore` that need configuration. IMO this is a lot easier to reason
about and trace than the previous approach of creating a
`HashMap<String, Value>` and then using that to make various structs
elsewhere.
2. We now inherit more configuration from the config used for regular Nu
tables
1. Border/line styling now uses the `separator` style used for regular
Nu tables, the special `explore.split_line` config point has been
retired.
2. Cell padding in tables is now controlled by `table.padding` instead
of the undocumented `column_padding_left`/`column_padding_right` config
3. The (optional, previously not enabled by default) `selected_row` and
`selected_column` configuration has been removed. We now only highlight
the selected cell. I could re-add this if people really like the feature
but I'm guessing nobody uses it.
The interface still looks the same with a default/empty config.nu:
# Description
Fixes: #13066
nushell should remove argument values' inner quote once it gets `=`.
Whatever it's a flag or not, and it also replace from `\"` to `"` before
passing it to external commands.
# User-Facing Changes
Given the shell script:
```shell
# test.sh
echo $@
```
## Before
```
> sh test.sh -ldflags="-s -w" github.com
-ldflags="-s -w" github.com
> sh test.sh exp='-s -w' github.com
exp='-s -w' github.com
```
## After
```
> sh test.sh -ldflags="-s -w" github.com
-ldflags=-s -w github.com
> sh test.sh exp='-s -w' github.com
exp=-s -w github.com
```
# Tests + Formatting
Added some tests
This fixes up a panic I accidentally introduced when refactoring the
cursor code in `explore`: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/12979
Under certain circumstances (running `:nu []`, opening `:try` with the
hidden `try.reactive` setting enabled), `explore` would panic when
handling an empty list. To fix this for now I've removed the validation
I added to the Cursor constructor in that PR.
# Description
This PR creates a `CITATION.cff` file.
# User-Facing Changes
Users will now be able to properly cite `nushell` when used e.g. in
scientific work. The `CITATION.cff` file also enables users to get the
citation withe the Github integration, see
[documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-citation-files).
More information about the `.cff` standard
[here](https://citation-file-format.github.io/).
# After Submitting
Do you want it documented in the docs somewhere? If so, where exactly?
Happy to make a PR there.
One feature that could well be implemented later on is automatic updates
to the CITATION file with a Github Action (this is outside of my comfort
zone, so I'll leave that for a separate PR should anyone want to
implement it). Ideally, the `CITATION.cff` file points to the latest
release , and could do so with the following fields:
```
commit:
version:
date-released:
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Mikkel Roald-Arbøl <github.ggb9a@simplelogin.co>
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: NotTheDr01ds <32344964+NotTheDr01ds@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
Related meta-issue: #10239.
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
This PR will modify some `str`-related commands so that they can be
evaluated at parse time.
See the following list for those implemented by this pr.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
Available now:
- `str` subcommands
- `trim`
- `contains`
- `distance`
- `ends-with`
- `expand`
- `index-of`
- `join`
- `replace`
- `reverse`
- `starts-with`
- `stats`
- `substring`
- `capitalize`
- `downcase`
- `upcase`
- `split` subcommands
- `chars`
- `column`
- `list`
- `row`
- `words`
- `format` subcommands
- `date`
- `duration`
- `filesize`
- string related commands
- `parse`
- `detect columns`
- `encode` & `decode`
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
Unresolved questions:
- [ ] Is there any routine of testing const expressions? I haven't found
any yet.
- [ ] Is const expressions required to behave just like there non-const
version, like what rust promises?
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
Unresolved questions:
- [ ] Do const commands need special marks in the docs?
# Description
Per a Discord question
(https://discord.com/channels/601130461678272522/1244293194603167845/1247794228696711198),
this adds examples to the `help` for both:
* `cd`
* `def`
to demonstrate that `def --env` is required when changing directories in
a custom command.
Since the existing examples for `def` were a bit more complex (and had
output) but the `cd` ones were more simplified, I did use slightly
different examples in each. Either or both could be tweaked if desired.
# User-Facing Changes
Command `help` examples
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Jakub Žádník <kubouch@gmail.com>
This one trace message creates thousands of lines of trace messages that
is probably
better suited to using on an *as needed* basis rather than everyone
having to wade
through it...
For now, I just commented it out but eventually this line of code should
be removed
and used simply for the time when someone needs to see it...
# Description
Add `--log-include` and `--log-exclude` options to filter the log output
from `nu` to specific module prefixes. For example,
```nushell
nu --log-level trace --log-exclude '[nu_parser]'
```
This avoids having to scan through parser spam when trying to debug
something else at `TRACE` level, and should make it feel much more
reasonable to add logging, particularly at `TRACE` level, to various
places in the codebase. It can also be used to debug non-Nushell crates
that support the Rust logging infrastructure, as many do.
You can also include a specific module instead of excluding the parser
log output:
```nushell
nu --log-level trace --log-include '[nu_plugin]'
```
Pinging #13041 for reference, but hesitant to outright say that this
closes that. I think it address that concern though. I've also struggled
with debugging plugin stuff with all of the other output, so this will
really help me there.
# User-Facing Changes
- New `nu` option: `--log-include`
- New `nu` option: `--log-exclude`
`explore` has 3 cursor-related structs that are extensively used to
track the currently shown "window" of the data being shown. I was
finding the cursor code quite difficult to follow, so this PR:
- rewrites the base `Cursor` struct from scratch, with some tests
- makes big changes to `WindowCursor`
- renames `XYCursor` to `WindowCursor2D`
- makes some of the cursor functions fallible as a start towards better
error handling
- changes lots of function names to things that I find more intuitive
- adds comments, including ASCII diagrams to explain how the cursors
work
More work could be done (I'd like to review/change more function names
in `WindowCursor` and `WindowCursor2D` and add more tests), but this is
the limit of what I can get done in a weekend. I think this part of the
code is in a better place now.
# Testing performed
I did a lot of manual testing in the record view and binary viewer,
moving around with arrow keys / page up+down / home+end.
This can definitely wait until after the release freeze, this area has
very few automated tests and it'd be good to let the changes bake a bit.
# Description
First part of SpanID refactoring series. This PR adds a `SpanId` type
and a corresponding `span_id` field to `Expression`. Parser creating
expressions will now add them to an array in `StateWorkingSet`,
generates a corresponding ID and saves the ID to the Expression. The IDs
are not used anywhere yet.
For the rough overall plan, see
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/12963.
# User-Facing Changes
Hopefully none. This is only a refactor of Nushell's internals that
shouldn't have visible side effects.
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
